The interface looks restrained in the design file. On a phone in daylight, the secondary label has disappeared into the background and the icon-only button could mean almost anything.
Visual polish should make the task easier to complete. It should not depend on ideal vision, perfect lighting or a precise tap.
Start with the ordinary task
Try the core workflow with larger system text, keyboard navigation where supported, and a screen reader. Check whether controls have useful names, focus remains visible and the reading order matches the visual order.
For a hypothetical invoice utility, the amount, recipient and export action deserve particular clarity. A decorative hierarchy that hides the important result is working against the job.
Keep meaning out of color alone
A red or green dot can supplement a status label. It should not be the only way to distinguish failure from success. Use text and structure so the state remains understandable in different viewing conditions.
Also test motion preferences. An animation that helps explain a transition should have a reduced-motion alternative when appropriate. A user should not have to tolerate unnecessary movement to reach a basic control.
Make errors recoverable
Put validation messages near the relevant field and explain what to change. Preserve entered information after a recoverable error. Avoid moving focus unpredictably or replacing the whole page when a small inline update would suffice.
These checks are practical product work, not a claim of formal accessibility certification. For a compliance requirement, evaluate against the applicable standard and involve appropriate expertise.
A small team can begin by testing the most important path and fixing concrete barriers. Repeat the check when that path changes.
The best-looking version of a utility is the one that still helps somebody finish the job when the screen is small, the environment is awkward and their attention is elsewhere.